Re: Behringer ECM8000 vs. Earthworks M30.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ live-audio Board ]

Posted by Bink on July 28, 2003 at 21:45:12:

In Reply to: Behringer ECM8000 vs. Earthworks M30. posted by Suso Ramallo on July 28, 2003 at 18:52:42:

Thank you, Suso, for the interesting graphs.

In the frequency transfer jpg, I can see that the Behringer stays within a 4dB window (relative to the Earthworks M30) until 20kHz. Since the Earthworks calibration graph shows the M30 to be (with a suspiciously 'smoothed' line) within a 0.7dB window until 20kHz that means the actual response of the Behringer could be .7dB closer to flat or .7dB farther from flat. We don't know. It might be more or less, depending on whether the M30 freq response really has little peaks and valleys that are not shown.

You said you tested three ECM8000 mics -- which one is shown? The worst one, the average one or the best (flattest) one? How did the three compare to each other? How much difference?

One more test I'm interested in is a strong sine tone fed to the Genelecs. I would like to see someone else's results to know if the harmonic ringing I saw in my ECM8000 (relative to my M30) is true for all Behringers or just mine.

I agree that the M30 is a better mic!

Thanks again for posting your test results.

-Bink

Follow Ups:


Post a Followup

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Subject : 
Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ live-audio Board ]

Universal Concept Message Software © 2000 2001 2002, ProSoundWeb.com Live Audio Board is a Trademark of Universal Concept Inc, Whitinsville, MA. All Rights Reserved.
By using this site, you agree to be bound by our terms and conditions